Search...
⌘K

PERC Rule for Pulmonary Embolism
PERC Rule for Pulmonary Embolism
Screens low-risk patients to rule out pulmonary embolism without further testing

PERC Rule for Pulmonary Embolism
PERC Rule for Pulmonary Embolism
Screens low-risk patients to rule out pulmonary embolism without further testing
Instructions
The PERC Rule is applied to patients with low clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism. Enter the patient’s details for eight clinical criteria. If all are negative and pretest probability is low, PE can be ruled out without further testing.
Overview
When to use
Why use
Evidences
Interpretation
Result | Interpretation |
All 8 criteria negative + low pretest probability | PE effectively ruled out without further testing |
Any criterion positive | Further evaluation with D-dimer and/or imaging required |
Kline JA, Mitchell AM, Kabrhel C, Richman PB, Courtney DM. Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: the PERC rule. J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2(8):1247–1255. Derivation of the 8-item Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC) to identify very low-risk ED patients in whom no D-dimer is needed.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00790.x
Singh B, Mommer SK, Erwin PJ, Mascarenhas SS, Parsaik AK. Pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) in pulmonary embolism—revisited: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Emerg Med J. 2013;30(9):701–706. Across 12 studies (n≈13,855), pooled sensitivity 97% and negative likelihood ratio 0.17 when applied to low-risk patients; supports safety of PERC in appropriate populations.
https://emj.bmj.com/content/30/9/701
Righini M, Van Es J, Den Exter PL, et al. Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out PE: the ADJUST-PE study. JAMA. 2014;311(11):1117–1124. Not a PERC paper, but informs downstream testing when PERC is positive: in low/intermediate probability patients, age-adjusted D-dimer safely reduces imaging.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/1841967?resultClick=1
Overview
When to use
Why use
Evidences
The Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC Rule) is a validated clinical decision tool designed to help clinicians exclude pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with a low pretest probability. Developed in the early 2000s, it reduces unnecessary testing such as D-dimer assays and imaging, which can be costly and expose patients to risks.
The rule is based on eight yes/no criteria: age less than 50 years, pulse under 100 beats per minute, oxygen saturation of at least 95% on room air, no hemoptysis, no estrogen use, no prior venous thromboembolism, no recent surgery or trauma requiring hospitalization, and no unilateral leg swelling. If all eight criteria are met (all negative), and the clinician’s overall gestalt suggests a low probability of PE, the likelihood of pulmonary embolism is very low.
This tool is particularly useful in emergency and acute care settings, where rapid decisions are essential. Its primary strength lies in its ability to reduce unnecessary investigations in low-risk patients, improving efficiency while maintaining safety. However, it should not be used in patients with moderate or high suspicion for PE, as false reassurance could delay lifesaving treatment.
Overview
When to use
Why use
Evidences
Interpretation
Result | Interpretation |
All 8 criteria negative + low pretest probability | PE effectively ruled out without further testing |
Any criterion positive | Further evaluation with D-dimer and/or imaging required |
Kline JA, Mitchell AM, Kabrhel C, Richman PB, Courtney DM. Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: the PERC rule. J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2(8):1247–1255. Derivation of the 8-item Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC) to identify very low-risk ED patients in whom no D-dimer is needed.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00790.x
Singh B, Mommer SK, Erwin PJ, Mascarenhas SS, Parsaik AK. Pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) in pulmonary embolism—revisited: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Emerg Med J. 2013;30(9):701–706. Across 12 studies (n≈13,855), pooled sensitivity 97% and negative likelihood ratio 0.17 when applied to low-risk patients; supports safety of PERC in appropriate populations.
https://emj.bmj.com/content/30/9/701
Righini M, Van Es J, Den Exter PL, et al. Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out PE: the ADJUST-PE study. JAMA. 2014;311(11):1117–1124. Not a PERC paper, but informs downstream testing when PERC is positive: in low/intermediate probability patients, age-adjusted D-dimer safely reduces imaging.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/1841967?resultClick=1
Frequently Asked Questions
Features and Services FAQs
Discover the full range of features and services we offer and how to use them.
Ready to Transform Your Practice?
Join thousands of clinicians saving hours daily with AI-powered documentation.
14-day free trial • No setup fees
Ready to Transform Your Practice?
Join thousands of clinicians saving hours daily with AI-powered documentation.
14-day free trial • No setup fees
Ready to Transform Your Practice?
Join thousands of clinicians saving hours daily with AI-powered documentation.
14-day free trial • No setup fees
DocScrib
AI-powered medical documentation platform revolutionizing clinical workflows through intelligent patient management and secure documentation.
DocScrib
AI-powered medical documentation platform revolutionizing clinical workflows through intelligent patient management and secure documentation.
DocScrib
AI-powered medical documentation platform revolutionizing clinical workflows through intelligent patient management and secure documentation.